Difference between revisions of "Talk:Interwave"
m (fix style of signature) |
m |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I thought they were bulky too, but after I talked with Mal3 in the IRC about it he told me that this information was outdated. Maybe we should start a forum thread about the status of Interweave nodes ? --[[User:HRogge|HRogge]] 08:09, 13 February 2011 (UTC) | I thought they were bulky too, but after I talked with Mal3 in the IRC about it he told me that this information was outdated. Maybe we should start a forum thread about the status of Interweave nodes ? --[[User:HRogge|HRogge]] 08:09, 13 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Considering I never got that memo, maybe we should... and we have. --[[User:Robkelk|Robkelk]] 16:51, 13 February 2011 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 16:51, 13 February 2011
Interwave nodes are large and bulky on purpose - it is not intended that somebody could include one in a cyborg or android body. Man-portable communications units are limited to lightspeed - relay the signal through a ground or vehicle station for FTL comms. --Robkelk 03:27, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
I was under the impression that we were easing back on that for plot purposes. --Mal-3 04:50, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
I thought they were bulky too, but after I talked with Mal3 in the IRC about it he told me that this information was outdated. Maybe we should start a forum thread about the status of Interweave nodes ? --HRogge 08:09, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
Considering I never got that memo, maybe we should... and we have. --Robkelk 16:51, 13 February 2011 (UTC)